Historically, information sources with bias have succeeded. Readers Digest is famous for projecting a specific world view, and it lasted many decades. So much

Historically, information sources with bias have succeeded. Readers Digest is famous for projecting a specific world view, and it lasted many decades. So much though I want to run with "the truth will make you free" I suspect the size of the chequebook behind this means we're all going to confront Grokpedia as a source of "trusted information" for some considerable time. I look forward to interesting messages outside of the white supremacist emerging, like weird science takes on genetics, proofs of god, assertions which are demonstrably false to their inputs but persist, doctered photos. God forbid that there is a significant launch failure on Musk's Mars push but when it comes, Grokpedia will be the last place I look for data on root cause analysis.