3 ms·
Has AI content detection become at all competent?
by squigz 1y ago
Has AI content detection become at all competent?
- cindyllm 1y ago[dead]
- Swenrekcah 1y agoI think we probably need to go the other way, a comment or article needs a ‘faceId’ check before submission to get human stamp. Of course that brings a whole another set of problems.
- squigz 1y agoThat sort of thing is trivial to bypass and is a massive privacy violation.
- wizzwizz4 11mo agoIt's only a massive privacy violation for honest folk!
- bethekidyouwant 1y ago“Encryption is easy — authentication is hard.”
- dylan604 1y agoFine, I'll just set up a head made by some SFX type that looks real enough for camera work.
- codingdave 1y agoFrom what I have seen, AI can detect AI better than humans. Humans are bringing baggage into it and vilifying legit writing techniques just because AI uses them. The whole concept that AI was trained on human writing, therefore uses well-known and proven writing techniques, but that those techniques are not exclusive to AI is utterly lost on some people. The "dead giveaways" are not writing patterns, it is depth. AI will stay at a surface level when using argumentative writing patterns, whereas humans will add supporting information and connect the dots across sentences and paragraphs. It is the lack of connective language between thoughts and phrases that flag an AI.