4 ms·
I can’t understand why you’re splitting hairs to this extent. The web is protocols; some are implemented at server side whereas others are implemented at browse
by hluska 11mo ago
I can’t understand why you’re splitting hairs to this extent. The web is protocols; some are implemented at server side whereas others are implemented at browser side. They’re all still protocols with a big dollop of marketing.
That statement was accurate enough if you’re willing to read actively and provide people with the most minimal benefit of the doubt.
- dpark 11mo agoMy response is in a chain discussing browsers in response to someone who literally said “The web wasn’t the browser it was the protocols.” I responded essentially “it was indeed also the browser”, which it seems you agree with so I don’t know what you’re even trying to argue about. > willing to read actively and provide people with the most minimal benefit of the doubt. Indeed
- croes 11mo agoMy point is, you could write your own server and your own browser to participate in the web, but you have to follow the protocols.