4 ms·
It's a pretty well established phenomenon and he cites israeli leaders. no need for ad-hominem attacks. What's your argument for allowing spyware?
by zapataband2 11mo ago
It's a pretty well established phenomenon and he cites israeli leaders. no need for ad-hominem attacks. What's your argument for allowing spyware?
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- vladgur 11mo agohe cited a single Israeli private citizen. not Israeli leaders. The fact that a data-harvesting bloatware is installed on common handsets should be controversial enough. Both the title of this post and the link try to add "Israel is baaaad" angle as just because a company was founded in Israel. Israel is a middle-eastern tech hub that produces a lot of tech companies and innovations. Its just a numbers game that some of them will be working on things of questionable value to humanity. What GP suggesting is discriminating against all technologies developed by Israel because of his political views, nothing more.
- ngcazz 11mo ago[flagged]
- richwater 11mo agoYour claim has nothing to do with the parent claim. Truthful or not, you can't write an article, have it debunked or disputed and then move onto another argument.
- zapataband2 11mo ago[dead]