I just read the MDN article of WS and you are right: WT is indeed treated as the successor of WS (in many use cases), which I did not expect at all: 'Additional

I just read the MDN article of WS and you are right: WT is indeed treated as the successor of WS (in many use cases), which I did not expect at all: 'Additionally, the WebTransport API is expected to replace the WebSocket API for many applications. WebTransport is a versatile, low-level API that provides backpressure and many other features not supported by either WebSocket or WebSocketStream, such as unidirectional streams, out-of-order delivery, and unreliable data transmission via datagrams.' https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/WebSockets_API https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/WebSockets_...