3 ms·
Only if every car has only one person - once you start getting 2 or more people in a car, driving starts to win[0] (and that's discounting the heavy multiplier
by zimpenfish 11mo ago
Only if every car has only one person - once you start getting 2 or more people in a car, driving starts to win[0] (and that's discounting the heavy multiplier you get from things like coaches and buses.)
[0] https://terrapass.com/blog/carbon-footprint-of-driving-vs-flying-whats-best-for-the-earth/ https://terrapass.com/blog/carbon-footprint-of-driving-vs-fl...
- anonym29 11mo agoRight, but you're missing the part where in the real world, nobody on the plane is going to carpool with other passengers they've never met, they're going to drive themselves in their own car, because people are not automatons that instinctively select the most climate-friendly option. We shouldn't be comparing the most optimistic outcome in the world as you'd prefer it to be that could happen as a result of the flight being cancelled, we should be comparing the most probable outcome in the world as it actually exists.
- zimpenfish 11mo ago> nobody on the plane is going to carpool with other passengers they've never met I would put a good $25 on there being almost zero flights in the world where every passenger has no relation to every other passenger (to the point where you'd need N individual cars to transport them.) I'd add another $10 on top to bet that there isn't a situation where all of those passengers would refuse to get on a train / bus / coach with the others if the plane wasn't available.
- mavhc 11mo agoExactly, just make trains better/cheaper/faster and planes worse/more expensive/slower