2 ms·
I find the idea of highly optimised MCP kind of funny. The protocol is so far from finished - the update for stateless MCP (which is our only hope at properly s
by noogai03 11mo ago
I find the idea of highly optimised MCP kind of funny. The protocol is so far from finished - the update for stateless MCP (which is our only hope at properly scaling it) isn't even released yet in the core protocol.
And even then - the LLMs are going to be so much slower than the MCP server, I've never quite understood the point of trying to optimise it. Even FastMCP is pretty good because everything is async.
But even given all that - this is very impressive :)
- orochimaaru 11mo agoThe agents call the MCPs, which could reside on resource constrained environments or devices. Other situations like MCPs that run on your laptop are better off as self contained binaries (my personal and probably unpopular opinion ;) ). So MCP optimization may be something that’s targeted to those areas.
- anuramat 11mo ago> so much slower unless you're working on 10 features in parallel with smaller models in best-of-4 groups
- 0xeb 11mo agoIt is not about optimization but more just having a C++ library. Then with C++ implementation, you get more portability than Python or other interpreted languages.