3 ms·
First, it's Google we're talking about here, not some cash starved startup. Second, you seem to have not completely read my post. It was more about the "update
by recoiledsnake 14y ago
First, it's Google we're talking about here, not some cash starved startup.
Second, you seem to have not completely read my post. It was more about the "update" and "upgrade" language. How would people on Linux feel if they tried to download a program and and it told them to "upgrade" to Windows to get it working?
>"We should always be open to new things so I won't sit here and say "you should just use Chrome because it's awesome and incredibly fast"
You should try Opera, it is awesome and incredibly fast :)
>and if they're differentiated enough they'll become standards everyone supports. Opera is not.
What is not differentiated enough and Opera is not what?
Opera is pretty good at following standards, it's no IE for sure.
Again, it's okay if web developers don't have the time to test and support Opera, just don't tell its users to update or upgrade to other browsers. Even "Best viewed in Internet Explorer" is less condescending We didn't get rid of that and Flash to end up back again in this browser sniffing mess.
- tomasien 14y agoI use Opera on slow connections, huge fan. Chrome before Chrome in my opinion (but now we have Chrome so.....) But yeah "best viewed on Internet Explorer" is always a treat isn't it! The word "update" was probably a little weak.