4 ms·
Doesn’t that constitute impersonation, or is it allowed since it’s supposedly obvious to be parody?
by brabel 11mo ago
Doesn’t that constitute impersonation, or is it allowed since it’s supposedly obvious to be parody?
- eloeffler 11mo agoI guess it's mainly un-sueable because the reference is very implicit (nothing but the last name) and using the name Swift by itself constitutes neither impersonation of someone specific nor a Trademark violation or anything like that. And Taylor Swift actually is invested in data security, so it's a compliment :) That's no reason against filing a lawsuit but much less for filing one.