4 ms·

Tbf it wouldn't take that much effort to issue guidance. It shouldn't require legislation. Doesn't mean the way they did things was wrong.

mrguyorama 11mo ago
It would be trivial to issue useful guidance, and that guidance would be beneficial even if it was incredibly stupid or misguided or even caused it's own problems, because it is a document that demonstrates that some thinking somewhere went into it, and someone has taken a minute to think through outcomes and effects. But the premise of the current administration is that the world is radically simpler than "experts" and "bureaucrats" want you to believe, and they purposely and loudly eschew any thinking about 2nd, 3rd, or often even 1st order effects of their proposals because they want them to sound "simple" to rather simple people, and rely on trite soundbites or false "truisms" to keep them propped up, and also because even a surface level examination of most of their claims or proposals forces you to confront how stupid they usually are. This administration and it's fiercest supporters view not thinking through things as a virtue. They view large proscriptions from the throne as good governance, because they want a king. That is very explicitly why what they did was wrong, even if it's not a big deal to get rid of the penny, and very few people will have problems with it, and I think state governments and even the fed really shouldn't have a problem accommodating it. Being purposely ignorant like that is stupid and wrong even when it doesn't have negative repercussions, because it WILL have negative repercussions somewhere, and they will be entirely preventable. See innocent citizens being deported and assaulted, and the extrajudicial murder of random drug mules driving cartel speedboats. The federal government and current administration has a tiny army of professionals who are sufficiently well equipped and paid to wargame out exactly this kind of thing to discover some corner cases. We are still paying them even as they do nothing. The current admin is so incompetent and averse to actual governance that they reject working systems that could even help them make their agenda a reality, but the bureaucracy being good and effective at what it does is antithetical to their worldviews and hostile to their individualist philosophies, and it's more important to make the government look bad than actually succeed at what they were elected to do.

mrguyorama 11mo ago

It would be trivial to issue useful guidance, and that guidance would be beneficial even if it was incredibly stupid or misguided or even caused it's own problems, because it is a document that demonstrates that some thinking somewhere went into it, and someone has taken a minute to think through outcomes and effects. But the premise of the current administration is that the world is radically simpler than "experts" and "bureaucrats" want you to believe, and they purposely and loudly eschew any thinking about 2nd, 3rd, or often even 1st order effects of their proposals because they want them to sound "simple" to rather simple people, and rely on trite soundbites or false "truisms" to keep them propped up, and also because even a surface level examination of most of their claims or proposals forces you to confront how stupid they usually are. This administration and it's fiercest supporters view not thinking through things as a virtue. They view large proscriptions from the throne as good governance, because they want a king. That is very explicitly why what they did was wrong, even if it's not a big deal to get rid of the penny, and very few people will have problems with it, and I think state governments and even the fed really shouldn't have a problem accommodating it. Being purposely ignorant like that is stupid and wrong even when it doesn't have negative repercussions, because it WILL have negative repercussions somewhere, and they will be entirely preventable. See innocent citizens being deported and assaulted, and the extrajudicial murder of random drug mules driving cartel speedboats. The federal government and current administration has a tiny army of professionals who are sufficiently well equipped and paid to wargame out exactly this kind of thing to discover some corner cases. We are still paying them even as they do nothing. The current admin is so incompetent and averse to actual governance that they reject working systems that could even help them make their agenda a reality, but the bureaucracy being good and effective at what it does is antithetical to their worldviews and hostile to their individualist philosophies, and it's more important to make the government look bad than actually succeed at what they were elected to do.