3 ms·
I had not thought much about it until now, but when I did, I guessed it was a cost-cutting move, as it seems to piggyback on equipment needed for other features
by mannykannot 11mo ago
I had not thought much about it until now, but when I did, I guessed it was a cost-cutting move, as it seems to piggyback on equipment needed for other features (principally ABS).
Now that you've mentioned it, I'm wondering if the auto manufacturers needed to get a bunch of regulators to drop secondary/emergency braking requirements in order to do this?
- giantg2 11mo agoMy guess is they implemented whoever they felt like and the regulations only require a "parking" brake, but don't talk about implementation.