3 ms·
It’s not illegal for me to share non-confidential data of my employer either, but if you were hiring, would you want to understand an applicants attitudes towar
by refurb 11mo ago
It’s not illegal for me to share non-confidential data of my employer either, but if you were hiring, would you want to understand an applicants attitudes towards such leaks especially after having issues with it in the past?
I would.
- sigwinch 11mo agoSo it’s not involved in a criminal investigation. Then it’s a loyalty test. Specifically, it reassures them you can keep a secret.
- SR2Z 11mo agoTo be fair, that's an important qualification for the job regardless of who is president. It's just the political loyalty that's a bad requirement.
- refurb 11mo agoWhy would political loyalty be bad? These are cabinet positions, not representatives of the voters whose actions change with changing voter sentiment. The cabinet is chosen to implement the President’s policies. It would be odd to select for people opposed to the policies or those would actively try and stop them through leaks.
- SR2Z 11mo agoPolitical loyalty is not bad (to a degree) but it is never good when it replaces actual competence as the main qualification, or when the required degree of loyalty is unreasonable.
- tootie 11mo agoThey are being asked if they have disparaged Patel or the administration. Not just keeping secrets. They want loyalty to the regime, not the nation. That is obvious enough given the overt actions of the entire DOJ.