4 ms·
I feel like the article is just too short for the given topic. So much more detail could have been added.
by lloydatkinson 11mo ago
I feel like the article is just too short for the given topic. So much more detail could have been added.
- forgotpwd16 11mo agoThere's a follow up post and there was supposed to be another one too but apparently was never written. Regarding code: >Once I return to work and get approval to open up the source code, I’ll make the repo public as well. Guess approval wasn't given?
- lloydatkinson 11mo agoCrazy his job allegedly owned his hobby project code
- btrettel 11mo agoUnfortunately, this is not uncommon. Check the agreements you signed with your current employer. You might be surprised.
- skywal_l 11mo agoIf you want more detail, may I suggest "The MS-DOS Encyclopedia" by Ray Duncan [0]. [0]: https://archive.org/details/The_MS-DOS_Encyclopedia_Ray_Duncan https://archive.org/details/The_MS-DOS_Encyclopedia_Ray_Dunc...
- jmmv 11mo agoYep, I thought so too! It’s a very interesting and fun topic. So… I cannot resist redirecting you to a set of articles I wrote about two years ago on DOS and memory management, which I think covers some of the basic parts. The first one is https://open.substack.com/pub/blogsystem5/p/from-0-to-1-mb-in-dos https://open.substack.com/pub/blogsystem5/p/from-0-to-1-mb-i...