3 ms·
Hearing a $5 tier on planetscale was cool and I was thinking about using it for a future project, but those specs are just way too low to be worth it for $5/mo.
by kikkia 11mo ago
Hearing a $5 tier on planetscale was cool and I was thinking about using it for a future project, but those specs are just way too low to be worth it for $5/mo. I think I will just get a $5/mo vps with 32x the CPU (probably more as this is 2 x86 cpu cores vs 1/16 arm) and 8x the ram for the same price. The stats, insights and dashboards are cool, but for hobbyist projects that's too steep for the specs you get in my opinion.
- 7moritz7 11mo ago5 bucks gets you 8gb ram 4 vcpu 75gb nvme at contabo actually i know this is apples and oranges but that's 16 times the ram
- znpy 11mo agoyou get all of those resources execpt what you need: a managed postgresql. the difference in price is really the value added by having someone else managing postgresql for you.
- _zoltan_ 11mo agowhat is there to manage on a single instance, single VM...
- saxenaabhi 11mo agopitr, setting up a replica, observability, performance reports etc
- matt-p 11mo agoI think in fairness it's an apples to oranges comparison. How long will it take you to setup postgres on a VM and sort out and pay for somewhere to put backups? Let's say only a hour, and your time is worth say $30/hour you've just spent 6 months of planetscale fees and you've still got to pay your VPS and backup provider.
- threatofrain 11mo agoIf you want apples to apples then Planetscale is compared to the ergonomics, pricing, and performance of the bests. If you want to compare you don’t analyze things in isolation by looking at your own expenses.
- 8n4vidtmkvmk 11mo agoThat's one way to look at it. I personally think it's worth burning a few hours to learn how to do something yourself even if you don't immediately get value out of it.
- matt-p 11mo agoI already know how to do it, I just don't see the value in it.