2 ms·
Statistic of how many head injuries you get if your head is smashed against a car door or the ground at high speed? I suggest you make the experiment, because,
by zobzu 14y ago
Statistic of how many head injuries you get if your head is smashed against a car door or the ground at high speed?
I suggest you make the experiment, because, I can only guess it hurts every time, and uhm, that's not backed by any statistic.
--
I'm not allowed to reply because this has been down-voted, so i'll reply here:
the study you linked is a net result of people NOT riding bicycles because they don't want to ride if they have to wear a helmet. Thus they die "faster" from lack of exercising. That's twisted crap, IMO. It doesn't mean not wearing a helmet is safer. It means: NOT DOING EXERCISE IS UNHEALTHY. That's a very different thing. Note that everyone else "against helmets" in the HN threads linked to similar stats (!)
As I wrote, I'm all for people being allowed to wear one, or not wear one. But at the end of the day, it's safer to wear one in many environments such as SF/NYC/Paris (yes, Paris too It's not like Amsterdam, at all.).
But since you like stats, here are stats, that helmets protected 85% of helmet-wearing riders, as this study does not compare to "people who wouldn't ride because the think a helmet is ugly":
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM198905253202101?HITS=20&hits=20&FIRSTINDEX=0&searchid=1004370623714_124372&stored_search=&tdate=10%2F31%2F1990&author1=Thompson&journalcode=nejm&RESULTFORMAT=&fdate=1%2F1%2F1988&sortspec=PUBDATE_SORTDATE+desc+Score+desc&titleabstract=Bicycle&maxtoshow= http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM198905253202101?HIT...
- mikeash 14y agoThis study claims that there is a substantial net increase in deaths from a law that would require helmets: http://www.cyclehelmets.org/1231.html http://www.cyclehelmets.org/1231.html Where's your evidence that helmets result in a net decrease in risk overall?
- mikeash 14y agoI'm incredibly disappointed with the quality of conversation in this thread. I expected a nice conversation about risks versus benefits. Instead, I see a bunch of people arguing with anecdotes and insults, and turning on anyone who makes even the slightest attempt to look at the situation rationally.
- zobzu 14y agoGiven how many messages you sent with the same tone as when you replied to me, I am not surprised you feel that way. I did give you the link you asked for and full explanation, but instead of discussing those, you're deriving the discussion with complains, which IMO, aren't valid. I'm guessing, and I might be wrong, but I'm guessing, it's partially because you do not accept my point of view as even possible. I don't see any insult in my messages, by the way. Oh and since I've been upvoted back, I can actually reply now. Yay.