3 ms·
I wonder if this minimum variance approach of averaging the measurements agrees with the estimate of the expected value we'd get from a Bayesian approach, at le
by shoo 11mo ago
I wonder if this minimum variance approach of averaging the measurements agrees with the estimate of the expected value we'd get from a Bayesian approach, at least in a simple scenario, say a uniform prior over the thing we're measuring and assume that our two measuring devices have unbiased errors described by normal distributions.
- jampekka 11mo agoAt least in the mathematically simpler scenario of a gaussian prior and gaussian observations, the posterior mean is computed by weighing by the the inverses of variances (aka precisions) just like this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjugate_prior https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjugate_prior
- ogogmad 11mo agoTo add, for anyone who's followed the link - that's entries numbers 1 and 2, or "Normal with known variance σ²" and Normal with known precision τ", under "When likelihood function is a continuous distribution". Also, note that the "precision" τ is defined as 1/σ².