3 ms·
> But that's a level of understanding I don't think they currently have I think they do, at least in some of the cases, especially if it's something well repre
by RealityVoid 11mo ago
> But that's a level of understanding I don't think they currently have
I think they do, at least in some of the cases, especially if it's something well represented in the dataset. I've been surprised sometimes by the insights it provides, and other times it's completely useless. That's one of the problems, it's unreliable, so you have to treat all info it gives you with doubt. But, anyways, at times it makes very surprising and seeming intelligent observations. It's worth at least considering it and thinking it through.
- Neywiny 11mo agoI guess I should try it before dismissing it, but I would be curious to see if it can accurately detect which things we've found workarounds for that need special attention and whatnot.
- RealityVoid 11mo agoAs mentioned, it's a throw of the die. It can find very obscure things that you forgot about and give you good ideas. It might come with utterly stupid ideas. You clearly need to drive these things else they will drive you and you won't like where it will take you.