4 ms·

why do they choose it? i have a windows workstation because one CNC machine that we use needs it. only other reason i can see is gaming? I have all 3 major OS

why do they choose it? i have a windows workstation because one CNC machine that we use needs it. only other reason i can see is gaming? I have all 3 major OSs at home and, honestly, Windows 11 is stuff of nightmares to me

y-c-o-m-b 11mo ago
I've given some good reasons before: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45858749 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45858749 The "solutions" provided to me so far for my primary issue (using Ableton Suite DAW) has not worked. There is no practical solution that allows this software to function in a Linux environment successfully. I can open the app, but that's the extent of it. It's not usable. > I so badly want to jump ship entirely, but there's several things holding me back. I do music production as a hobby and Ableton Live doesn't play nice with Linux. In fact it seems anything that is resource intensive without native linux support has some issues. I'm also an MS stack developer, so things like Visual Studio Pro aren't available (although I've been using Cursor IDE more and more these days). Lastly I have some games acquired through "the high seas" in which a work-around doesn't exist for compatibility. > The responses I got were to switch to different software. No, no, and no. I paid a lot of money for Ableton Suite and poured many many hours into learning how to use it; it's the DAW I prefer to use, I don't want to switch. > Having said this, I did try to dual boot recently with Linux Mint, and once again ran into headaches getting my Logitech mouse buttons to work.
blacklion 11mo ago
Adobe products, for example. Or any of other of miriad of other products which have only Win/MacOS and no Linux support. And, no, Wine cannot run anything. You see, I don't need OS at all, I need applications. Some of these applications are "universal" (FireFox, for example), some has good equivalents, and some are unique to OS. And, no, DarkTable, or RAW Therappe are not equivalent to Lightroom or Capture One. And no, there is no equivalent to foobar2000 among music players.
- anthk 11mo ago
  MPD + advanced clients pown foobar 2000 anytime. Also, Audacious, Strayberry... Audacious with audacious-plugins could play anything (even video game music files) and it still has ProjectM plugins' support.
  - blacklion 11mo ago
    When I've tried MPD last time (about 2 years ago, to be honest) it failed to play wv.iso format, and I have this abomination in my collection. Also, it is not very good with broken tags, MP3 tags in local codepages (different for different albums!), etc. You cannot imagine what can be seen in the wild when it is musical collection started in 1995! Heck, I'm downloading mpd for windows right now and I'll try to add my collection into it. But I'm not holding my breath, all previous attempts to import my collection in any software failed for 15-20% of collection (different ones for different software).
  - blacklion 11mo ago
    Nope, UI for mpd shows that there is 11093 albums in my collection, but first several screens of Albums is all sequences of `?`. Very useful. Number itself doesn't looks right, my estimation is at least half of this number, maybe less. On the other hand same client shows only 6391 files, which is waaaay to small number if 1 file = 1 track. Ok, there is a lot of image + CUE albums, I wonder, is it 2 files or one? So it is useless, unfortunately. foobar2000 allows me add folder / file set to playlist and start listening. With system "Artist/Year - Album" on the file system it is easy and convenient. Tags could be broken, but all mys music is here and I always know where to look for what I want to listen now.
- noosphr 11mo ago
  >And, no, Wine cannot run anything. Wine may not be able to run the apps you need, but it can run plenty. The older the software gets the more wine becomes the only option to run it.
- ac29 11mo ago
  You can run nearly any Windows app with winboat. Its not based on wine, it runs real windows in a container.
1bpp 11mo ago
Creative Cloud and DAWs. Those are my only reasons and basically the only reasons I ever hear from people. A Linux port of Photoshop would probably put a small dent in Windows' market share at this point.
Anixx1 11mo ago
Windows architecture is better. It is from the 1990s (ad was very advanced at the time), while Linux architecture is from the 1960s.
Anixx1 11mo ago
One reason is that Linux has no backwards compatibility and to maintain each piece of software in the repos, you need people. It is linear: more software requires more maintainers, otherwise the software stops to compile in a year or two.

y-c-o-m-b 11mo ago

I've given some good reasons before: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45858749 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45858749 The "solutions" provided to me so far for my primary issue (using Ableton Suite DAW) has not worked. There is no practical solution that allows this software to function in a Linux environment successfully. I can open the app, but that's the extent of it. It's not usable. > I so badly want to jump ship entirely, but there's several things holding me back. I do music production as a hobby and Ableton Live doesn't play nice with Linux. In fact it seems anything that is resource intensive without native linux support has some issues. I'm also an MS stack developer, so things like Visual Studio Pro aren't available (although I've been using Cursor IDE more and more these days). Lastly I have some games acquired through "the high seas" in which a work-around doesn't exist for compatibility. > The responses I got were to switch to different software. No, no, and no. I paid a lot of money for Ableton Suite and poured many many hours into learning how to use it; it's the DAW I prefer to use, I don't want to switch. > Having said this, I did try to dual boot recently with Linux Mint, and once again ran into headaches getting my Logitech mouse buttons to work.

blacklion 11mo ago

Adobe products, for example. Or any of other of miriad of other products which have only Win/MacOS and no Linux support. And, no, Wine cannot run anything. You see, I don't need OS at all, I need applications. Some of these applications are "universal" (FireFox, for example), some has good equivalents, and some are unique to OS. And, no, DarkTable, or RAW Therappe are not equivalent to Lightroom or Capture One. And no, there is no equivalent to foobar2000 among music players.

anthk 11mo ago
MPD + advanced clients pown foobar 2000 anytime. Also, Audacious, Strayberry... Audacious with audacious-plugins could play anything (even video game music files) and it still has ProjectM plugins' support.
- blacklion 11mo ago
  When I've tried MPD last time (about 2 years ago, to be honest) it failed to play wv.iso format, and I have this abomination in my collection. Also, it is not very good with broken tags, MP3 tags in local codepages (different for different albums!), etc. You cannot imagine what can be seen in the wild when it is musical collection started in 1995! Heck, I'm downloading mpd for windows right now and I'll try to add my collection into it. But I'm not holding my breath, all previous attempts to import my collection in any software failed for 15-20% of collection (different ones for different software).
- blacklion 11mo ago
  Nope, UI for mpd shows that there is 11093 albums in my collection, but first several screens of Albums is all sequences of `?`. Very useful. Number itself doesn't looks right, my estimation is at least half of this number, maybe less. On the other hand same client shows only 6391 files, which is waaaay to small number if 1 file = 1 track. Ok, there is a lot of image + CUE albums, I wonder, is it 2 files or one? So it is useless, unfortunately. foobar2000 allows me add folder / file set to playlist and start listening. With system "Artist/Year - Album" on the file system it is easy and convenient. Tags could be broken, but all mys music is here and I always know where to look for what I want to listen now.
noosphr 11mo ago
>And, no, Wine cannot run anything. Wine may not be able to run the apps you need, but it can run plenty. The older the software gets the more wine becomes the only option to run it.
ac29 11mo ago
You can run nearly any Windows app with winboat. Its not based on wine, it runs real windows in a container.

1bpp 11mo ago

Creative Cloud and DAWs. Those are my only reasons and basically the only reasons I ever hear from people. A Linux port of Photoshop would probably put a small dent in Windows' market share at this point.

Anixx1 11mo ago

Windows architecture is better. It is from the 1990s (ad was very advanced at the time), while Linux architecture is from the 1960s.

Anixx1 11mo ago

One reason is that Linux has no backwards compatibility and to maintain each piece of software in the repos, you need people. It is linear: more software requires more maintainers, otherwise the software stops to compile in a year or two.