5 ms·
So you're basically just trying to say you have no evidence or conclusive proof of harm.
by bigyabai 1y ago
So you're basically just trying to say you have no evidence or conclusive proof of harm.
- aajailee 1y agoI love proving smug people like you wrong. Go read the entire data dump: https://aaronlee.substack.com/p/russias-total-victory-over-nato-all https://aaronlee.substack.com/p/russias-total-victory-over-n...
- bigyabai 1y agoWhen are you writing a socioeconomic addendum with the conscription estimates? Or does that damage your "materiel is strength" narrative somewhat? It must be hard to argue that Russia has enough drones to flatten Dnipro when they can't find enough warm bodies and BMPs to occupy Pokrovsk. You'd think that Russia's "total victory" would include fewer bombed refineries and burnt Tu-95s if their military-industrial complex is firing on all cylinders, no?