3 ms·
If this wasn’t related to software, it’d simply be called fraud. Selling an AI service that has no AI is lying. But when it’s a SaSS product it becomes an insp
by ungreased0675 1y ago
If this wasn’t related to software, it’d simply be called fraud. Selling an AI service that has no AI is lying.
But when it’s a SaSS product it becomes an inspirational hustle culture story.
- henry2023 1y agoA business charges for a service and the service was met. what’s the problem here? I would bet the TOS mentioned manual reviews.
- jlarocco 1y agoIMO the real fraud was against the investors. If I invest in your AI startup and find out it's really people doing the work, I'm going to be pissed.
- ajcp 1y ago"I'll get you to the moon safely" = NASA "I'll get you to the moon" = me with a wood chipper and a very powerful potato gun The startup charged for "AI note- taking", not simply "note taking".
- jacquesm 1y agoConfidentiality breach. You are supposed to have processes in place to guarantee that your customers data is safe from employees that are not explicitly disclosed to the customer from having access. Saying 'a program makes annotations' versus 'me and my buddy are sitting in undisclosed on your confidential meeting' are two entirely different things from a legal perspective.