4 ms·
>But we don't even need a human brain. We already have those, they take months to grow, take forever to train This is a weird argument considering LLMs are com
by kryogen1c 11mo ago
>But we don't even need a human brain. We already have those, they take months to grow, take forever to train
This is a weird argument considering LLMs are composed of the output of countless hours of human brains. That makes LLMs, by definition, logarithmically worse at learning.
- rekrsiv 11mo agoNot all artificial neurons are LLMs. Machine learning can be applied to any kind of large data set, not just human prose, and will start finding useful patterns before a human brain has time to learn how many fingers it has.