4 ms·
What an unnecessarily wordy article. It could have been a fifth of the length. The actual point is buried under pages and pages of fluff and hyperbole.
by Legend2440 11mo ago
What an unnecessarily wordy article. It could have been a fifth of the length. The actual point is buried under pages and pages of fluff and hyperbole.
- johnwheeler 11mo agoYes, and I agree and it seems like the author has a naïve experience with LLMs because what he’s talking about is kind of the bread and butter as far as I’m concerned
- Al-Khwarizmi 11mo agoIndeed. To me, it has long been clear that LLMs do things that, at the very least, are indistinguishable from reasoning. The already classic examples where you make them do world modeling (I put an ice cube into a cup, put the cup in a black box, take it into the kitchen, etc... where is the ice cube now?) invalidate the stochastic parrot argument. But many people in the humanities have read the stochastic parrot argument, it fits their idea of how they prefer things to be, so they take it as true without questioning much.
- Legend2440 11mo agoMy favorite example: 'can <x> cut through <y>?' You can put just about anything in there for x and y, and it will almost always get it right. Can a pair of scissors cut through a boeing 747? Can a carrot cut through loose snow? A chainsaw cut through a palm leaf? Nailclippers through a rubber tire? Because of combinatorics, the space of ways objects can interact is too big to memorize, so it can only answer if it has learned something real about materials and their properties.
- asimilator 11mo agoSummarize it with an LLM.
- joshdifabio 11mo agoYes. I left in frustration and came to the comments for a summary.
- turnsout 11mo agoSo, a Substack article then
- ThrowawayTestr 11mo agoI'd expect nothing less from a historian
- mmaunder 11mo agoThe author is far more fascinated with themselves than with AI.
- falcor84 11mo agoI would just suggest that if you want your comment to be more helpful than the article that you're critiquing, you might want to actually quote the part which you believe is "The actual point". Otherwise you are likely to have people agreeing with you, while they actually had a very different point that they took away.
- _giorgio_ 11mo agoI missed the point, please point me to it