2 ms·
No it’s a red herring (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring) It’s a fundamentally flawed argument
by AndrewKemendo 1y ago
No it’s a red herring (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring)
It’s a fundamentally flawed argument
- whilenot-dev 1y agoWhat a weird stance. You agree to mislead or distract from a relevant or important question?
- sethaurus 1y agoAttempt generosity. Can you think of another way to interpret the comment above yours? Is it more likely they are calling their own argument a red herring, or the one they are responding to? If something looks like a "weird stance", consider trying harder to understand it. It's better for everyone else in the conversation.
- AndrewKemendo 1y agoI was supporting the GPs premise directly