3 ms·
I've long thought copyright should only apply if the work is available for sale, or they are actively preparing another printing so they can sell it again in th
by bluGill 1y ago
I've long thought copyright should only apply if the work is available for sale, or they are actively preparing another printing so they can sell it again in the near future.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- ianburrell 1y agoThen there would be digital stores where old works go to die. Which might be better than now if price was reasonable and support good. But could easily be expensive, unsupported, and goes after pirates. Authors already have problems with getting their books back when out of print. Ebooks make it worse cause they can stay in print with low effort. I like idea of copyright with short span, like 10 years, and then have to register and renew for every subsequent decade. That would give registry of owners who are serious about work. Would never see public domain movies, but there are lots of obscure works that would be public domain.
- NooneAtAll3 1y ago> But could easily be expensive, unsupported, and goes after pirates. nothing stops that from happening even now, tho
- giantrobot 1y agoCopyrights should have a similar schedule to patents. The first period of coverage is no-cost but subsequent renewals increase in price, perpetual copyright should be financially ruinous but copyright should exist so a creator of a work can profit off it for a reasonable duration.