3 ms·
> If only as a PR move, the insurance industry could easily build some examples of such construction, push for building codes friendly to them, and offer far-ch
by rekabis 1y ago
> If only as a PR move, the insurance industry could easily build some examples of such construction, push for building codes friendly to them, and offer far-cheaper hail damage insurance for them.
That wouldn’t lower costs for consumers, that would only allow the insurance companies to have lower costs for themselves.
Remember: prices for consumers only ever go up. Even if costs to the company go down, that is an opportunity to see higher profits. It’s why the cost of groceries continued to go up even as cashiers were replaced by self-checkouts.
Under capitalism, businesses have only one responsibility, and that’s to their already fantastically wealthy shareholders. Anything that increases shareholder value is good. Anything which doesn’t is bad. And so the average Joe is squeezed from both ends in order to extract every last possible penny.
It doesn’t have to be like that, but our civilization has been brainwashed into thinking that an exceptionally tiny group of obscenely wealthy people parasitizing off of the bulk of humanity for every last shred of wealth they have is somehow the only possible economic system.
- bell-cot 1y agoThat sounds like a heartfelt generalization of modern plutocrapitalism - but meanwhile I have dead-tree-edition bills for groceries, insurance, rent, etc. which show that prices do sometimes go down. Both from coop/mutual, and from for-profit providers. And if you want lower insurance premiums to be possible - the reality is that any provider has to take in enough money so that their claims checks don't bounce. Plus, 99% of ordinary people would prefer to live in homes that didn't get wrecked by bad weather.