4 ms·
If it's a known avenue of identification, one would think a state-sponsored group would have policies in place to combat that sort of fingerprinting. All of tha
by squigz 1y ago
If it's a known avenue of identification, one would think a state-sponsored group would have policies in place to combat that sort of fingerprinting. All of that would also be trivial to spoof/plant so as to distract from the real source.
> That's why they talk about high confidence.
I don't think "Just trust us" is good enough, not when there are various groups - the companies reporting these hacks included - with incentives to blame China.
- cindyllm 1y ago[dead]
- viraptor 1y ago> If it's a known avenue of identification, one would think a state-sponsored group would have policies in place to combat that sort of fingerprinting. It relies on people not being perfect and not caring that much. So far, it's working pretty well and the identification leaks are consistent for years.
- squigz 1y agoHow do we know? Is China like, "Oops, yeah, haha, that's us. gg"