The author already fully addressed this in the article. They just think that even the fact that this was allowed to move forward is a worrying sign: > Judge St

The author already fully addressed this in the article. They just think that even the fact that this was allowed to move forward is a worrying sign: > Judge Stein’s order doesn’t resolve the authors’ claims, not by a long shot. And he was careful to point out that he was only considering the plausibility of the infringement allegation and not any potential fair use defenses. Nonetheless, I think this is a troubling decision that sets the bar on substantial similarity far too low.