> The thing is, kubernetes resources are already an abstraction. What I meant by that is that kubernetes resources are generic. "Objects" in the cluster repres

> The thing is, kubernetes resources are already an abstraction. What I meant by that is that kubernetes resources are generic. "Objects" in the cluster representing arbitrary things. And this makes sense because, it's okay if one doesn't know what cgroups and namespaces are to deploy a container/pod resource. What I'm trying to say is that this kind of arbitrary abstraction is what k8s brought to the table but people keep trying to abstract again on top of that which makes no sense. "Resource" is already generic.