> voters being chosen rather than being the ones to choose With the Missouri Compromise, when territories were admitted, their voters were being chosen for pol

> voters being chosen rather than being the ones to choose With the Missouri Compromise, when territories were admitted, their voters were being chosen for political reasons. Territories were admitted two by two, slave holding and free to maintain a status quo. This falls under your definition of gerrymandering. There is no justification for this gerrymandering. There's nothing so great about Wyoming such that it should have such an outsized influence on the body politic while possessing the GDP of a mid-sized county.