4 ms·
The problem is that the number of house members per state is capped, which results in more-populous states having less influence per-capita than less-populous s
by mring33621 11mo ago
The problem is that the number of house members per state is capped, which results in more-populous states having less influence per-capita than less-populous states. So, in a way, more-populous states are disadvantaged in both the house and senate.
- giantg2 11mo agoDo you have a link to that being a widespread problem after the huntington-hill method was used? For example, Delaware?
- cthalupa 11mo agoWyoming is an easy example 590,000 / 342,800,000 roughly 0.00172 0.00172 × 435 roughly 0.75 Wyoming would not even qualify for a full seat in the House if it wasn't for minimums at this size house.