> I don't understand why vigilante justice is perceived as necessary against those who exchange child pornography. What else do we have when it comes against T

> I don't understand why vigilante justice is perceived as necessary against those who exchange child pornography. What else do we have when it comes against Tor? Nothing, pretty much. > It feels as if it's the activity of a bunch of keyboard jockeys who want to feel like "heros", but who don't want the more dangerous opponent of say, organized crime or corrupt governments. It's far harder to actually expose corruption within a government in a way it would produce any kind of results. I'd argue that in many cases even if you would know that something is corrupt, it's very hard to make it lead to consequences. Look at corrupt countries and how much people can do about it.