3 ms·
I'm so sick of the "curation" discussion - if companies like NYT go belly-up, there won't be anything for Huffington Post et al. to "curate". It's inherently de
by kmfrk 14y ago
I'm so sick of the "curation" discussion - if companies like NYT go belly-up, there won't be anything for Huffington Post et al. to "curate". It's inherently derivative.
The clip of NYT's David Carr discussing this in a debate in the documentary Page One is unavailable, but I encourage people to watch it.
Clayton Cubitt originally described professionalism versus amateurism very well, but this will do:
“Can an amateur take a picture as good as a professional?
Sure,” Ms. Eismann said. “Can they do it on demand?
Can they do it again? Can they do it over and over?
Can they do it when a scene isn’t that interesting?”
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/30/business/media/30photogs.html?pagewanted=all http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/30/business/media/30photogs.h...
It bothers me that people equate "news" and "journalism".
- enfinity8 14y agoNews and journalism are the same information content. Curation is distinct from production and the world will be fine without the NYT. Thanks for the downvote, pal. Empty complaints and no intellectual contribution.