3 ms·
Not sure if it is just me, but the background animation absolutely kill my browser (Chrome) and scrolling is _super_ laggy.
by 1a527dd5 11mo ago
Not sure if it is just me, but the background animation absolutely kill my browser (Chrome) and scrolling is _super_ laggy.
- PhilipRoman 11mo agoFWIW it's smooth on my $150 android shitbox.
- GaryBluto 11mo agoI'm using a high-end ThinkPad for CAD and it's slowing down the page for me too.
- NSPG911 11mo agothe animation is so useless and doesnt add anything to the actual post
- udev4096 11mo agoI would highly suggest to block JS while you're only browsing. It loads fast, most trackers won't load and better security as most browser exploits leverage JS all the time
- a022311 11mo agoExactly this. I was surprised to see these comments and then I realized that NoScript blocked the JS (as it should have). The web is so much nicer without JS.
- aavshr 11mo agoyes, had to use reader mode.
- embedding-shape 11mo agoI have a RTX Pro 6000 as my main GPU currently, and this website pins it to ~40% utilization! Never seen a website do that before, some sort of kudos to the webmaster is deserved. It still renders smoothly though and doesn't go above 40C so I guess it could have been worse.
- pohuing 11mo ago40% might just mean nothing because your core is probably not running at full clock.
- embedding-shape 11mo agoWith that website open, runs at 2850 MHz to be specific, it normally idles at 400-500 MHz with ~20 processes (firefox, gnome-shell, alacritty, etc, etc) using the GPU
- Elfener 11mo agoI had no performance problems on my Thinkpad T410. Oh wait, it's because it is too old to have WebGL support so the background crashed and thus consumed no processing power.
- mid-kid 11mo agoThe worst part to me is the lack of a scroll bar. Had to dust off the pgup/pgdown keys to check my progress in the article.
- johnisgood 11mo ago>13 years old hardware, Linux, Chromium-based browser, seems fine to me.