Seems like overly long copium about nothing in particular. The author makes some assertions, like that elizabeth warren is a viable candidate or that the republ

Seems like overly long copium about nothing in particular. The author makes some assertions, like that elizabeth warren is a viable candidate or that the republican party will weaken in coming years due to demographic changes, or that shale gas is a bubble. But the way in which it is written reveals an insecurity that this may not be the case. The author expresses frustration that the new york times has a variety of perspectives. >It often seems as though the Democratic and Republican parties are unconsciously perceived as the wife and husband in a very, very traditional marriage, since the former is supposed to defer to and please the latter, and the latter is free to run roughshod over the former I think the author may be a bit trapped by their habit of seeing everything along gender lines