4 ms·

I don't know what virtue signaling means. I think you mean they just did it out of spite.

• TacticalCoder 11mo ago
  Refusing to pay a ransom and instead giving the money to the "ennemies" of the attackers isn't "virtue signaling" (as someone already commented: it's a "fuck you" to the attackers). In french we call that a "pied de nez". "Turning the table" / "Poetic justice" / "Adding insult to injury" would all be more correct than "virtue signalling". If there was no attacker and the company gave half a mil out of nowhere to a security company (or a charity) and boasted publicly about it, that would be virtue signalling. But refusing to pay the ransom and giving the exact same amount to security researchers is just a big, giant, middle finger. And a middle finger ain't no virtue signalling.
  • walletdrainer 11mo ago
    If they wanted to meaningfully give a middle finger to the attackers they’d be spending the money lobbying for a ransomware payments ban, not throwing away money by giving it to universities that have a plenty of money and will probably do absolutely nothing to reduce ransomware attacks in the foreseeable future.