3 ms·
I like that they distinguish between the collider mesh (lower poly) and the detailed mesh (higher poly). As a game developer I'm looking for: • Export low-pol
by jtfrench 11mo ago
I like that they distinguish between the collider mesh (lower poly) and the detailed mesh (higher poly).
As a game developer I'm looking for:
• Export low-poly triangle mesh (ideally OBJ or FBX format — something fairly generic, nothing too fancy)
• Export texture map
• Export normals
• Bonus: export the scene as "de-structured" objects (e.g. instead of a giant world mesh with everything baked into it, separate exports for foreground and background objects to make it more game engine-ready.
Gaussian splats are awesome, but not critical for my current renderers. Cool to have though.
- ehnto 11mo agoAren't the gausian splats the output here? Or are these worlds fully meshed and textured assets? From my understanding, admittedly quite a shallow look so far, the model generates gaussian splats then from that could implement the collider. I guess from the splat and the colliders you could generate actual assets that could be interactable/animated/have physics etc. Unsure, exciting space though! I just don't know how I would properly use this in a game, the examples are all quite on-rails and seem to avoid interacting too much with stuff in the environment.
- lewispollard 11mo agoThe page shows, near the bottom, how the main output is gaussian splats, but it can also generate triangular meshes (visual mesh + collider). However, to my eye, the triangular meshes shown look pretty low quality compared to the splat: compare the triangulated books on the shelves, and the wooden chair by the door, as well as weird hole-like defects in the blanket by the fireplace. It's also not clear if it's generating one mesh for the entire world, it looks like it is - that would make interactability and optimisation more difficult (no frustrum culling etc, though you could feasibly chop the mesh up into smaller pieces I suppose).