Sorry but this is bullshit. That's now how computers work. First, being able to make a CPU run at 100% is not a metric for how efficient a language is. If anyt

Sorry but this is bullshit. That's now how computers work. First, being able to make a CPU run at 100% is not a metric for how efficient a language is. If anything, it could show that the language is very inefficient. Further, it's not really the language but your own code that influences the usage of a CPU. The only thing it might prove is that there is no blocking IO going on, but that doesn't mean anything re:efficiency, and can be done with any language... Seriously, I wanted to write here a list of how wrong this guy is, but I just stopped because it's so ridiculous and I'm too tired, I can't even put it in to words. I'm leaving it for someone more capable to explain further. Apparently this guy "learned" 18 programming languages but doesn't even know the basics about how processors work.