2 ms·
"Sorry bro gonna let you die because, muh investments, you see" Your closing remark is overly simplistic and offers a contradiction: if those things would work
by isoprophlex 1y ago
"Sorry bro gonna let you die because, muh investments, you see"
Your closing remark is overly simplistic and offers a contradiction: if those things would work for these obese people, they wouldn't need GLPs.
- exabrial 1y agoThe laws of thermodynamics apply to everyone equally.
- asdff 1y agoWhere in thermodynamic principles does it suggest money ought to flow into the pockets of the few?
- phantasmish 1y agoThe standard for medical interventions usually isn’t “could it work?” or “should it work?” but “does it work?” This is why the efficacy of every single contraceptive method isn’t way higher than it is. Lots of them should work almost perfectly… but the harder they are to use correctly, the less effective they in-fact are.
- exabrial 1y agoEating less, exercising more, has worked for the entire existence of human race. In fact, it worked for me just fine too. GLP-1s are a safe and proven tool and should be used wherever appropriate to assist people. Both of these are simple facts that aren't in contradiction with either other. But saying the patent owners shouldn't be allowed to reap the benefits of their investment is ridiculous, especially when it's completely possible to lose weight in other ways. 6 years isn't that long to wait anyway.
- ck2 1y agojust want to point out it's not just for obesity GLP-1 has been demonstrated to even cure some types of long-covid in some people in some cases and various other diseases but it's priced way out of reach even for micro-doses until it becomes generic so all those cases suffer until 2030, if they make it that far, five years is a long time