2 ms·
To be fair, of all the LLM coding agents, I find Codex+GPT5 to be closest to this. It doesn't really offer any commentary or personality. It's concise and doe
by cmrdporcupine 1y ago
To be fair, of all the LLM coding agents, I find Codex+GPT5 to be closest to this.
It doesn't really offer any commentary or personality. It's concise and doesn't engage in praise or "You're absolutely right". It's a little pedantic though.
I keep meaning to re-point Codex at DeepSeek V3.2 to see if it's a product of the prompting only, or a product of the model as well.
- Tiberium 1y agoIt is absolutely a product of the model, GPT-5 behaves like this over API even without any extra prompts.
- cmrdporcupine 1y agoI prefer its personality (or lack of it) over Sonnet. And tends to produce less... sloppy code. But it's far slower, and Codex + it suffers from context degradation very badly. If you run a session too long, even with compaction, it starts to really lose the plot.