4 ms·
Even in your example (which is obviously not correct representation of prolog), that code will work X orders magnitude faster and with 100% reliability compared
by riku_iki 11mo ago
Even in your example (which is obviously not correct representation of prolog), that code will work X orders magnitude faster and with 100% reliability compared to much more inferior LLM reasoning capabilities.
- szundi 11mo agoThis is not the point though
- Onavo 11mo agoAlgorithmically there's nothing wrong with using BFS/DFS to do reasoning as long as the logic is correct and the search space is constrained sufficiently. The hard part has always been doing the constraining, which LLMs seem to be rather good at.
- riku_iki 11mo ago> This is not the point though could you expand what is the point? That authors opinion without much justification is that this is not reasoning?