3 ms·

I've recently started modeling some of my domains/potential code designs in Prolog. I'm not that advanced. I don't really know Prolog that well. But even just u

I've recently started modeling some of my domains/potential code designs in Prolog. I'm not that advanced. I don't really know Prolog that well. But even just using a couple basic prolog patterns to implement a working spec in the 'prolog way' is *unbelievably* useful for shipping really clean code designs to replace hoary old chestnut code. (prolog -> ruby)

ramses0 1y ago
I keep wishing for "regex for prolog", ie: being able to (in an arbitrary language) express some functional bits in "prolog-ish", and then be able to ask/query against it. let prologBlob = new ProLog() prologBlob.add( "a => b" ).add( "b => c" ) prologBlob.query( "a == c?" ) == True (not exactly that, but hopefully you get the gist) There's so much stuff regarding constraints, access control, relationship queries that could be expressed "simply" in prolog and being able to extract out those interior buts for further use in your more traditional programming language would be really helpful! (...at least in my imagination ;-)
- zemptime 1y ago
  I've wished for the same kind of 'embed prolog in my ruby' for enumerating all possible cases, all invalid cases, etc in test suites. Interesting to know it's not just me!
  - naasking 1y ago
    Maybe try a Ruby Kanren implementation: https://minikanren.org/ https://minikanren.org/ uKanren is conceptually small and simple, here's a Ruby implementation: https://github.com/jsl/ruby_ukanren https://github.com/jsl/ruby_ukanren
  - dflock 1y ago
    There are a bunch of libraries that will do this - here's one example of a python one: https://github.com/yuce/pyswip https://github.com/yuce/pyswip - and a ruby one: https://github.com/preston/ruby-prolog https://github.com/preston/ruby-prolog
    - zemptime 1y ago
      I did try ruby-prolog. The deeper issue is that its just not prolog. Writing in actual prolog affords a lot of clarity and concision which would be quite noisy in ruby-prolog. To me, the difference was stark enough it wasn't worth any convenience already being in ruby was worth.
      - dragonwriter 1y ago
        Porolog might be more to your liking. https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/porolog#porolog-wiki https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/porolog#porolog-wiki
- dflock 1y ago
  There are a bunch of libraries that will do this - here's one example of a python one: https://github.com/yuce/pyswip https://github.com/yuce/pyswip - and a ruby one: https://github.com/preston/ruby-prolog https://github.com/preston/ruby-prolog
  - ramses0 1y ago
    Thanks for the reference! `pyswip` is the closest I've seen so far: pl.consult("some-facts.pl") pl.assertz("new(fact)") while pl.Query(...).nextSolution(): print( X.value ) ...will definitely keep it in my back pocket!
    - dragonwriter 1y ago
      pyswip is a one-way python-to-SWI-prolog interface; there's also a first-party (maintained as part of SWI-prolog), two-way one called janus-swi. https://pypi.org/project/janus-swi/ https://pypi.org/project/janus-swi/ https://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/man?section=janus-call-prolog https://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/man?section=janus-call-prol...
- dragonwriter 1y ago
  While usually using native syntax rather than strings, somethign like that exists for most languages of any popularity (and many obscure ones), in the form of miniKanren implementations. https://minikanren.org/ https://minikanren.org/
  - dragonwriter 1y ago
    If you really want something that takes Prolog strings instead (and want the full power of prolog), then there are bindings to prolog interpreters from many languages, and also SWI-Prolog specifically provides a fairly straightforward JSON-based server mode "Machine Query Interface" that should be fairly simple to interface with any language. https://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/man?section=mqi-overview https://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/man?section=mqi-overview
- svieira 1y ago
  You might be interested in Flix: https://play.flix.dev/?q=PQgECUFMBcFcCcB2BnUBDUBjA9gG15JtAJbaKjYBmolaRyAdAFAAmk1A5jAGJ3TIAKAJQAuUAGIA3qAAKaeJETQA8pQEBlaPGKIOAGlCbtuoQYCCiTJGTRs8VRq079hpydABfUAF4JkpqCBsvKKKmoARDLYALYADpAAnuEG4UZoAEbY4ULMQcEKSg7hAOKIaJCwyMmgkTHxSTkBQXIFYQK1cZDEaNUd9dm5zSGFEeqQAB5wVSlRnQ3MHkxMIMAQMAgo6Fh4BESk5FSg8LAEqLbbcbDQkOiW1rbwjKzsoFzQ4CfWwmJS+aEORmcBkBJnMdxsdgBbhcII4Qk8Pj8TUCFisEPsanGBgS8JEAFo-iMBFjQDjBijwQ8HCSAF64gmo+6QzHY0ygRnohwJAx0hZLFagADCdWwyGsoGgAAsbrR6LcWEdPsgDGhEAqcJdrmdpaBcJRYsw2NRomgdN9QABVRDEaCgAA6oAAksofMjQABHWCQeAJV48PiCNlvD6nYRuvJi3a24msmjwGLsynMmOk+EAHwAfKBYsZoLhEEwgA https://play.flix.dev/?q=PQgECUFMBcFcCcB2BnUBDUBjA9gG15JtAJb... is an embedded Datalog DB and query in a general-purpose programming language. More examples on https://flix.dev/ https://flix.dev/
- shawn_w 1y ago
  You can do that in Racket, with the Racklog library¹. There's also Datalog² and MiniKanren and probably some other logic languages available. [1] https://docs.racket-lang.org/racklog/index.html https://docs.racket-lang.org/racklog/index.html [2] https://docs.racket-lang.org/datalog/index.html https://docs.racket-lang.org/datalog/index.html
- jll29 1y ago
  What you mean is not "regex for Prolog" but an embedded PROLOG interpreter, which exists. Ironically, the most common way I have seen people do this is use an embedded LISP interpreter, in which a small PROLOG is easily implemented. https://www.metalevel.at/lisprolog/ https://www.metalevel.at/lisprolog/ suggests Lisprolog (Here are some embedded LISPs: ECL, PicoLisp, tulisp) SWI-Prolog can also be linked against C/C++ code: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65118493/is-there-any-reasonable-way-to-embed-a-prolog-interpreter-inside-of-a-c-program https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65118493/is-there-any-re... https://sourceforge.net/p/gprolog/code/ci/457f7b447c2b9e90a09956ff15fd277d269b1d98/tree/examples/ExamplesC/ https://sourceforge.net/p/gprolog/code/ci/457f7b447c2b9e90a0... Racklog is an embedded PROLOG for Racket (Scheme): https://docs.racket-lang.org/racklog/ https://docs.racket-lang.org/racklog/
- tejtm 1y ago
  You could try picat [0] https://picat-lang.org/ https://picat-lang.org/
elxr 1y ago
I wonder if there's examples of whole product architectures done in Prolog, seems like an elegant solution if done right. I've been looking for a concise way to model full architectures of my various projects, without relying on having a typical markdown file. Which is separate from the actual types in the code. Which is separate from the deployment section of the docs.

ramses0 1y ago

I keep wishing for "regex for prolog", ie: being able to (in an arbitrary language) express some functional bits in "prolog-ish", and then be able to ask/query against it. let prologBlob = new ProLog() prologBlob.add( "a => b" ).add( "b => c" ) prologBlob.query( "a == c?" ) == True (not exactly that, but hopefully you get the gist) There's so much stuff regarding constraints, access control, relationship queries that could be expressed "simply" in prolog and being able to extract out those interior buts for further use in your more traditional programming language would be really helpful! (...at least in my imagination ;-)

zemptime 1y ago
I've wished for the same kind of 'embed prolog in my ruby' for enumerating all possible cases, all invalid cases, etc in test suites. Interesting to know it's not just me!
- naasking 1y ago
  Maybe try a Ruby Kanren implementation: https://minikanren.org/ https://minikanren.org/ uKanren is conceptually small and simple, here's a Ruby implementation: https://github.com/jsl/ruby_ukanren https://github.com/jsl/ruby_ukanren
- dflock 1y ago
  There are a bunch of libraries that will do this - here's one example of a python one: https://github.com/yuce/pyswip https://github.com/yuce/pyswip - and a ruby one: https://github.com/preston/ruby-prolog https://github.com/preston/ruby-prolog
  - zemptime 1y ago
    I did try ruby-prolog. The deeper issue is that its just not prolog. Writing in actual prolog affords a lot of clarity and concision which would be quite noisy in ruby-prolog. To me, the difference was stark enough it wasn't worth any convenience already being in ruby was worth.
    - dragonwriter 1y ago
      Porolog might be more to your liking. https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/porolog#porolog-wiki https://www.rubydoc.info/gems/porolog#porolog-wiki
dflock 1y ago
There are a bunch of libraries that will do this - here's one example of a python one: https://github.com/yuce/pyswip https://github.com/yuce/pyswip - and a ruby one: https://github.com/preston/ruby-prolog https://github.com/preston/ruby-prolog
- ramses0 1y ago
  Thanks for the reference! `pyswip` is the closest I've seen so far: pl.consult("some-facts.pl") pl.assertz("new(fact)") while pl.Query(...).nextSolution(): print( X.value ) ...will definitely keep it in my back pocket!
  - dragonwriter 1y ago
    pyswip is a one-way python-to-SWI-prolog interface; there's also a first-party (maintained as part of SWI-prolog), two-way one called janus-swi. https://pypi.org/project/janus-swi/ https://pypi.org/project/janus-swi/ https://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/man?section=janus-call-prolog https://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/man?section=janus-call-prol...
dragonwriter 1y ago
While usually using native syntax rather than strings, somethign like that exists for most languages of any popularity (and many obscure ones), in the form of miniKanren implementations. https://minikanren.org/ https://minikanren.org/
- dragonwriter 1y ago
  If you really want something that takes Prolog strings instead (and want the full power of prolog), then there are bindings to prolog interpreters from many languages, and also SWI-Prolog specifically provides a fairly straightforward JSON-based server mode "Machine Query Interface" that should be fairly simple to interface with any language. https://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/man?section=mqi-overview https://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/man?section=mqi-overview
svieira 1y ago
You might be interested in Flix: https://play.flix.dev/?q=PQgECUFMBcFcCcB2BnUBDUBjA9gG15JtAJbaKjYBmolaRyAdAFAAmk1A5jAGJ3TIAKAJQAuUAGIA3qAAKaeJETQA8pQEBlaPGKIOAGlCbtuoQYCCiTJGTRs8VRq079hpydABfUAF4JkpqCBsvKKKmoARDLYALYADpAAnuEG4UZoAEbY4ULMQcEKSg7hAOKIaJCwyMmgkTHxSTkBQXIFYQK1cZDEaNUd9dm5zSGFEeqQAB5wVSlRnQ3MHkxMIMAQMAgo6Fh4BESk5FSg8LAEqLbbcbDQkOiW1rbwjKzsoFzQ4CfWwmJS+aEORmcBkBJnMdxsdgBbhcII4Qk8Pj8TUCFisEPsanGBgS8JEAFo-iMBFjQDjBijwQ8HCSAF64gmo+6QzHY0ygRnohwJAx0hZLFagADCdWwyGsoGgAAsbrR6LcWEdPsgDGhEAqcJdrmdpaBcJRYsw2NRomgdN9QABVRDEaCgAA6oAAksofMjQABHWCQeAJV48PiCNlvD6nYRuvJi3a24msmjwGLsynMmOk+EAHwAfKBYsZoLhEEwgA https://play.flix.dev/?q=PQgECUFMBcFcCcB2BnUBDUBjA9gG15JtAJb... is an embedded Datalog DB and query in a general-purpose programming language. More examples on https://flix.dev/ https://flix.dev/
shawn_w 1y ago
You can do that in Racket, with the Racklog library¹. There's also Datalog² and MiniKanren and probably some other logic languages available. [1] https://docs.racket-lang.org/racklog/index.html https://docs.racket-lang.org/racklog/index.html [2] https://docs.racket-lang.org/datalog/index.html https://docs.racket-lang.org/datalog/index.html
jll29 1y ago
What you mean is not "regex for Prolog" but an embedded PROLOG interpreter, which exists. Ironically, the most common way I have seen people do this is use an embedded LISP interpreter, in which a small PROLOG is easily implemented. https://www.metalevel.at/lisprolog/ https://www.metalevel.at/lisprolog/ suggests Lisprolog (Here are some embedded LISPs: ECL, PicoLisp, tulisp) SWI-Prolog can also be linked against C/C++ code: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65118493/is-there-any-reasonable-way-to-embed-a-prolog-interpreter-inside-of-a-c-program https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65118493/is-there-any-re... https://sourceforge.net/p/gprolog/code/ci/457f7b447c2b9e90a09956ff15fd277d269b1d98/tree/examples/ExamplesC/ https://sourceforge.net/p/gprolog/code/ci/457f7b447c2b9e90a0... Racklog is an embedded PROLOG for Racket (Scheme): https://docs.racket-lang.org/racklog/ https://docs.racket-lang.org/racklog/
tejtm 1y ago
You could try picat [0] https://picat-lang.org/ https://picat-lang.org/

elxr 1y ago

I wonder if there's examples of whole product architectures done in Prolog, seems like an elegant solution if done right. I've been looking for a concise way to model full architectures of my various projects, without relying on having a typical markdown file. Which is separate from the actual types in the code. Which is separate from the deployment section of the docs.