3 ms·
Content aside, it would be better if we avoided sources like UNILAD [0]. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNILAD https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNILAD
by lo_zamoyski 1y ago
Content aside, it would be better if we avoided sources like UNILAD [0].
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNILAD https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNILAD
- wonks 1y agoI'm honestly disappointed that this post got so much attention with such a dubious source. The article doesn't even link to a press release, as far as I can tell.
- tokai 1y agoIt gives both the full name of fungus and the name of a researcher plus his affiliation. More information than you often get fore more 'reputable' sources. Criticizing something only on the basis of the source, while the actual content is completely fine, is peak cargo cult information literacy.