3 ms·
I agree that it feels insecure, but is there really a difference between this and downloading and running files from a .tar.gz or installing a .deb for example?
by halvsjur 14y ago
I agree that it feels insecure, but is there really a difference between this and downloading and running files from a .tar.gz or installing a .deb for example?
- foobarqux 14y agodebs are authenticated.
- dfc 14y agoYes. apt-get: $ ls -l /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/ Source Installation: $ wget http://nmap.org/dist/sigs/nmap-6.01.tgz.asc $ wget http://nmap.org/dist/nmap-6.01.tgz $ gpg nmap-6.01.tgz.asc
- sgt 14y agoThe point is that most people don't do this.
- dfc 14y agoIts built into apt. Unless you are suggesting that most people do: # apt-get --allow-unauthenticated ...
- willholloway 14y agoThis is an important part of why Debian and its derivatives are superior to OS X for web development. If you like Mac hardware like I do, at least run a Linux distro as a virtual machine and save yourself the trouble of Homebrew or its contemporaries.
- jaredonline 14y agoWith a .tar.gz you can verify a checksum.