3 ms·

Stunk and White, the bane of descriptivist linguists everywhere, strikes again! I'm disappointed in Zuckerberg.

• defen 14y ago
  Have you read David Foster Wallace's take[1] on this issue? To me[2] it seems like a good case for a form of prescriptivism. I do have to admit that I'm a huge fan of DFW and am surprised anyone was able to write an interesting article about the "linguistic wars", so maybe that colors my opinion somewhat. [1] http://harpers.org/media/pdf/dfw/HarpersMagazine-2001-04-0070913.pdf http://harpers.org/media/pdf/dfw/HarpersMagazine-2001-04-007... [1a] [1a] PDF warning [2] Someone with no background in or knowledge of linguistics
  • rhizome 14y ago
    Non-PDF: http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/DFW_present_tense.html http://instruct.westvalley.edu/lafave/DFW_present_tense.html
  • devilshaircut 14y ago
    This isn't a citation but you might be interested in checking out The Language Log (a language blog, as you may have guessed). That would be a good (and incredibly interesting) place to start to see the countering view to prescriptivism. Personally, they sold me on the idea of "prescriptivist poppycock" years ago, particularly the flavor of it presented in The Elements of Style. I thoroughly loathe that book, mostly for reasons discussed on TLL. The "grammar" in that book haunts my prose to this day. EDIT: Fixed a typo caused by me pecking out this reply on my iPhone.