4 ms·

Copyright and performance rights are two separate things. It's completely fine for me to go and perform (not record - that does need a license) the latest hit s

• autoexec 11mo ago
  > It's completely fine for me to go and perform (not record - that does need a license) the latest hit song until my heart is content. Only in private. Copyright law can give the owner exclusive rights to perform a song publicly. If the lawyers can convince a judge that your singing counts as a public performance you can end up on the hook for not getting or being covered under a performance license. https://lawwithmiller.com/blogs/copyrights/cover-me-im-legal-how-to-not-get-sued-for-cover-songs https://lawwithmiller.com/blogs/copyrights/cover-me-im-legal...
  • Braxton1980 11mo ago
    The right to quote allows the use of copyrighted text with limits that are followed by OpenAI https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_quote https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_quote I think your copyright argument is focused on media, like music. This appears be a specific exception that applies to text. Music sampling for example is a direct copy of the recording but quoting text, even though it's a copy, is a new work because although the words are the same it's not the original copied (as in the quote is written or typed by OpenAI).
• pessimizer 11mo ago
  It absolutely is not. This is completely wrong.