> One thing is putting a canary clause in a contract between companies to check if they actually read all the clauses Not following the letter of a canary clau

> One thing is putting a canary clause in a contract between companies to check if they actually read all the clauses Not following the letter of a canary clause, especially if you don't recognize it as such because it's inane and prima-donna-esque, doesn't mean you didn't read the clause. It's an assumption that Roth is making which he falsely believes has given him special insight into the contractors, when in fact it's entirely possible and even probable that the meaningless canary clause requirement was ignored in favor of actually handling the real, important requirements. The best stage technician in the world could very well say, "he can get his own damn M&Ms", and that would not detract one iota from their skill or legitimacy. Ask most professionals to do dumb shit outside their job description, and that's the response you'll get, rightfully so.