> You're mixing up the feature and the moving parts. No, you are, and this is why so many of us are shit at UX. The ability to accomplish a task with software

> You're mixing up the feature and the moving parts. No, you are, and this is why so many of us are shit at UX. The ability to accomplish a task with software is an asset. Not every application takes the same number of interactions to finish a task, and each interaction is a feature. Features in neither waterfall, scrum, nor Kanban directly correlate with the ability of the user to accomplish something meaningful. They are units of measure of the developer accomplishing something meaningful, but the meaning is assumed, not real.