3 ms·

> If they didn't read the catering closely, did they also skim the electrical schematics? This is dumb pop-psych stuff, like the "make interview candidates wai

> If they didn't read the catering closely, did they also skim the electrical schematics? This is dumb pop-psych stuff, like the "make interview candidates wait then reject them if they don't know the other candidates' names" type hiring "tricks". It's barely different than judging someone based on their handshake grip strength, imo. Perhaps these companies prioritized the work properly, and determined that electrical work and scaffolding- both things that could kill people- were more important than M&Ms. > If you don't release until your pluralization is perfect you've waited too long. But I put making sure the pluralization was perfect in there to see if you're the kind of people who pay attention to detail! ;P

darkwater 1y ago
> This is dumb pop-psych stuff, like the "make interview candidates wait then reject them if they don't know the other candidates' names" type hiring "tricks". It's barely different than judging someone based on their handshake grip strength, imo. Wait, what? How are these related? One thing is putting a canary clause in a contract between companies to check if they actually read all the clauses (which had to be followed due to technical requirements that could make a stage collapse, for example), and another is your example. Why are people in this sub-thread (including the grand-parent that started it) try to read between the lines of what David Lee Roth said? It's pretty clear and a solid way of doing businesses. Could they be just lying to justify their rock-star attitude back in the day? I highly doubt so.
- ang_cire 11mo ago
  > One thing is putting a canary clause in a contract between companies to check if they actually read all the clauses Not following the letter of a canary clause, especially if you don't recognize it as such because it's inane and prima-donna-esque, doesn't mean you didn't read the clause. It's an assumption that Roth is making which he falsely believes has given him special insight into the contractors, when in fact it's entirely possible and even probable that the meaningless canary clause requirement was ignored in favor of actually handling the real, important requirements. The best stage technician in the world could very well say, "he can get his own damn M&Ms", and that would not detract one iota from their skill or legitimacy. Ask most professionals to do dumb shit outside their job description, and that's the response you'll get, rightfully so.
  - darkwater 11mo ago
    They added it because they routinely had issues with venues not doing the mandatory things. He also explains that their show was bigger than the other ones in terms of installation size (9 trucks vs 3). So, saying that it was just a primadonna caprice it's actually going the "easy way" here: following the rockstar stereotype we all have in mind.

darkwater 1y ago

> This is dumb pop-psych stuff, like the "make interview candidates wait then reject them if they don't know the other candidates' names" type hiring "tricks". It's barely different than judging someone based on their handshake grip strength, imo. Wait, what? How are these related? One thing is putting a canary clause in a contract between companies to check if they actually read all the clauses (which had to be followed due to technical requirements that could make a stage collapse, for example), and another is your example. Why are people in this sub-thread (including the grand-parent that started it) try to read between the lines of what David Lee Roth said? It's pretty clear and a solid way of doing businesses. Could they be just lying to justify their rock-star attitude back in the day? I highly doubt so.

ang_cire 11mo ago
> One thing is putting a canary clause in a contract between companies to check if they actually read all the clauses Not following the letter of a canary clause, especially if you don't recognize it as such because it's inane and prima-donna-esque, doesn't mean you didn't read the clause. It's an assumption that Roth is making which he falsely believes has given him special insight into the contractors, when in fact it's entirely possible and even probable that the meaningless canary clause requirement was ignored in favor of actually handling the real, important requirements. The best stage technician in the world could very well say, "he can get his own damn M&Ms", and that would not detract one iota from their skill or legitimacy. Ask most professionals to do dumb shit outside their job description, and that's the response you'll get, rightfully so.
- darkwater 11mo ago
  They added it because they routinely had issues with venues not doing the mandatory things. He also explains that their show was bigger than the other ones in terms of installation size (9 trucks vs 3). So, saying that it was just a primadonna caprice it's actually going the "easy way" here: following the rockstar stereotype we all have in mind.