3 ms·
The problem was "have documents that look the same on any device, including printed paper and computer screens", and the approach was "PostScript does that for
by wongarsu 1y ago
The problem was "have documents that look the same on any device, including printed paper and computer screens", and the approach was "PostScript does that for printers, let's simplify it and make it more universal". Both the problem it's solving and the approach were fine, maybe even great. Since then over three decades have passed, pdf has gained a plethora of features, some less well thought out than others, and real-world requirements are completely different than they were in the early 90s. If we were to invent pdf today it would likely look completely different. But it's still good enough that it's hard for a new format to offer an advantage compelling enough to replace pdf.
- ethin 1y agoRight, but that's what I'm getting at: PDF is just a terrible format all round. People do things with it that have nothing to do with document preservation. We have PDF forms, we have PDFs able to execute arbitrary JS (which can modify the rendering of the document, completely defeating the entire reason for the format existing)... Like IMO the format just has no reason to exist/be used anymore given how bloated and over-complicated it is.
- ericpauley 1y agoThat's why we have PDF/A: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDF/A https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDF/A
- DHRicoF 1y agoHeck. I need any replacment to be at least equally capable of PDFs. The minimum I expect is for it to be able to run Linux in them. https://github.com/ading2210/linuxpdf https://github.com/ading2210/linuxpdf /s