3 ms·
I was on Mastodon for three years. I deleted my account. When I found out that Charlie Kirk was murdered, my second thought was "well, best create yet another f
by lewiscollard 11mo ago
I was on Mastodon for three years. I deleted my account. When I found out that Charlie Kirk was murdered, my second thought was "well, best create yet another filter on Mastodon so I don't have to watch people celebrate Charlie Kirk being murdered" and when I caught myself having that thought I realised that being on Mastodon was a net negative for my wellbeing.
(I didn't like the guy either, by the way, or at least I knew enough about him that I knew I have much better things to do than listen to him. There are more than a few people like that, all of whom I wish find some peace in their hearts, and none of whom I wish to come to any harm.)
Mastodon is packed to the brim with literal psychopaths and people pretending to be psychopaths for imaginary Internet points. It is not an experience I suggest for anyone who is neither of those things.
- ekjhgkejhgk 11mo agoI'm on mathstodon.xyz (mastodon for maths) and haven't seen any of that. So I guess it's the people you subscribe to. But I have the freedom to decide what I want to consume.
- lewiscollard 11mo ago> I'm on mathstodon.xyz (mastodon for maths) and haven't seen any of that. So I guess it's the people you subscribe to. I was on an automotive-focused instance. I did see a lot of that. > But I have the freedom to decide what I want to consume. As do I; I had the freedom to delete my account, thus avoiding the need for any active measures to make my life free of schizoposting.
- ekjhgkejhgk 11mo agoTIL there's many Charlie Kirk fans amongst fans of cars?
- lewiscollard 11mo agoIf this is intended to accuse me of being a Charlie Kirk fan I can only conclude that you either did not read what I wrote (in which case, you should refrain from replying to it), or you are being dishonest on purpose.
- glenneroo 11mo agoI don't see how you made that leap. It was directly in reference to your reply: > I was on an automotive-focused instance. I did see a lot of that. They were more or less just rewriting what you wrote.
- lewiscollard 11mo ago> They were more or less just rewriting what you wrote. The literal opposite of what I wrote, actually, because "that" refers to "celebrating the murder of Charlie Kirk", an activity not much associated with fans of Charlie Kirk.
- glenneroo 11mo agoOuch, yeah, thanks for the explanation. Total reading comprehension failure on my part.
- ekjhgkejhgk 11mo agoThanks for the clarification. TIL there's many Charlie Kirk haters amongst fans of cars?
- WorldMaker 11mo agoFrom early in my Mastodon journey I made it something of rule to not follow anyone who doesn't CW politics, and mute or block many of the accounts that post politics on main unfiltered. I don't need that many filters if people make good use of Subject lines (I do like to joke that CW is the short Welsh for Cwbject.) It means I don't see a lot of "celebrities" in my feed that cross-post from one of the other sites and doesn't add CWs because their client or cross-poster doesn't support them, but that seems to be so much the better. It also often means I remove Boost privileges in my feeds from people that will boost stuff without CWs. That sort of curation is a lot of little bits of work over years. I can definitely understand the feeling that the easiest way to catch up on that curation is to just quit. It's why I quit Twitter (when it was still Twitter). It's why I don't bother with BlueSky or Threads. Mastodon gives me enough curation tools and I've used them for long enough that I feel happy with Mastodon.